MINUTES OF DECEMBER 10, 2007
PRESENT: Commissioners:
Larry Bruno Laurie Tryon, City Recorder
Jeff Nielson
Alfred Richens
EXCUSED: Commissioner
Lyon
OTHERS PRESENT: Laurel Marinos, Brent Hadfield,
Chris Micoz, Kathy Hanna-Smith, Rick Davis,
I PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chairman
Bruno led the Pledge of Allegiance
II ROLL CALL
III MINUTES
OF NOVEMBER 26, 2007
A favorable motion to approve the minutes of November
26, 2007 as amended was made by Commissioner Shook. Commissioner R. Richens
seconded the motion. Motion carried.
Item VIII. Line four (4) to include a reference to
the state requirements for handyman services as opposed to City
requirements relative to
IV PUBLIC HEARING- TO RECEIVE INPUT ON A
REQUEST TO RE-ZONE THE
PROPERTY
CONTAINING AND SURROUNDING THE
COMPLEX
AS PUBLIC FACILITIES (PF), CURRENTLY ZONED MULTIPLE
RESIDENTIAL
7 (MR-7)
MOTION. Commissioner A. Richens moved to open the public
hearing at 6 p.m. to receive input on the request to re-zone
the property containing and surrounding the Price City Public Works Complex.
Motion seconded by
Commissioner
Nielson and carried. Sidney Nelson an adjacent property owner and resident
neighboring to the Public Works complex came to the hearing to receive more
information on the re-zone to the area. Gary Sonntag, Public Works Director
assured Mr. Nelson that the re-zone would not affect the surrounding residential
neighbor’s property. The re-zone is for the public works facilities and would
only affect that property and the property of
V RE-ZONE REQUEST POTENTIAL APPROVAL- RECOMMENDED
AUTHORIZATION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST TO RE-ZONE
THE PROPERTY CONTAINING AND
SURROUNDING
THE PRICE CITY PUBLIC WORKS COMPLEX AS PUBLIC
FACILITIES
(PF), CURRENTLY ZONED MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL 7 (MR-7)
AMENDING
A PORTION OF THE LAND USE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT
CODE
WITH ORDINANCE 2007-02 BY THE CITY COUNCIL
A request from the Price City
Engineer has been received regarding rezoning of the area surrounding the Price
City Public Works Complex (PWC) from the MR-7 zoning district to the PF zoning
district. Essentially two (2) properties
are affected by this request: (1) Price
City Public Works; and, (2)
VI HOME OCCUPIED BUSINESS- OFFICE USE
ONLY-FINAL
248
N. 300 E. - MILLER CONSTRUCTION- JIM MILLER, OWNER
Mr. Miller was not
present at meeting. MOTION. Commissioner A. Richens
moved to table item VI. Motion seconded by Commissioner Shook
and carried.
VII CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT- AMENDMENT-FINAL
396
SOUTH CARBON AVENUE- A.L. ENTERPRISES, INC. -
A.L. Enterprises, Inc., owner
Doris L. Miller, requested an amendment to the conditional use permit (CUP) for
their
business
regarding it’s move from 190 South 200 West to
building). Mrs.
Miller stated that there will not be any changes made to the business in regard
to the product and
that no
manufacturing of the product will be done at the location. The conditions
stated below were read aloud to
the
Millers by Chairman Bruno. The sign for the building will be placed on the
building and on the window with the
size dimensions
turned in to the City for administrative approval. Window blinds will be placed
in the windows to
keep
the product from view. There are no parking issues or concerns at this
location. Commissioner Shook asked
how
many employees would be at the building. Mrs. Miller stated that there are six
(6) full time employees at this
time.
Commissioner Nielson questioned sexually oriented business concerns and cited
section 9.78.060 of the SOB
ordinance.
Nick Tatton stated that the business is not considered an SOB under the
definitions in the SOB ordinance
as the
business does only mail order, internet sales and no retail sales from the
building will be done.
Items of consideration relative to this amendment request
include:
·
The business is
not subject to the specific criteria and conditions contained within the Price
City Sexually Oriented Business (SOB) Ordinance inasmuch as no retail activity
is taking place at the physical location. This evaluation and interpretation of
activities has been confirmed with the
·
The business is
not considered manufacturing and thus is available in the Commercial
Development (CD) zoning district. The
business will be conducing minor assembly with incoming and outgoing freight
service. The business is available in
the CD zoning district, under Section 12.3 of the Code providing that the
business maintains its standing and operation in a manner “appropriate…for high
intensity public, quasi-public, commercial, office and multiple family uses which
may center in harminous relationships based on planned development for mutual
benefit”.
·
The business is
further available, by Conditional Use Permit (CUP) under the reference to
Section 11.3.5.4 of the Code as a business conducting “Apparel repair, alteration
and cleaning, pickup services, shoe repair services.” Additionally the business
activity is permitted under the
reference to Section 11.3.4.31 of the Code as a business operating as a “Mail
Order House”.
·
Staff recommended
conditions to consider for final approval of the A. L. Enterprises, Inc. CUP
amendment include:
o
Site visit(s)
conducted by staff to ensure compliance with conditions set forth. Finding that periodic site visits to ensure
compliance with permit conditions will promote long-term compliance with
conditions and improve the overall economic condition within the community
through operation of the business while preserving the health, safety and
welfare of the community.
o
No manufacturing
activities to take place at the location.
Finding that manufacturing is not an available land use within the
Commercial Development (CD) zoning district and only land uses that are
available by Conditional Use Permit or Permitted under Section 12.3 and
referenced to Section 11.3.5.4 of the code, (Apparel repair, alteration and
cleaning, pickup services, shoe repair services) and Section 11.3.4.31 (Mail
Order House) are appropriate for approval.
o
Signage to
indicate corporate name and contact information only with no product displays
and all proposed signage to be submitted for review and approval prior to
installation and consistent with the provisions of Chapter 4 of the Price City
Land Use Management and Development Code.
Finding that required review and approval of all signage maintains the
consistent signage in the community and promotes an aesthetic and economically
friendly community.
o
Maintain window
blinds on all windows in a working condition and all blinds to be closed in
order to obscure sight of operations or product from public view. Finding that sight obscuring window
treatments will inhibit inappropriate or unauthorized possible viewing of
product or operation and is in the best interest of the health, safety and
welfare of the community.
o
No retail sales
from the location. Finding that retail
sales at the location may require the business to become subject to the
provisions of the SOB ordianance and would have a
detrimental impact on the economic capability of the business in the community
and may have negative impacts on neighboring land uses.
o
No activity at
the location that may be interpreted to require the business become subject to
the provisions of the SOB ordinance.
Finding that a detrimental impact on the economic capability of the
business in the community may result and negative impacts on neighboring land
uses may occur.
o
All employee
parking and freight services (in or out) to be maintained within the property
boundaries and not within the public right-of-way. Finding that maintaining all parking and
freight services within the property boundaries mitigates potential negative
traffic and pedestrian impacts on
MOTION.
Commissioner A. Richens moved to approve the A.L. Enterprises CUP amendment
with the conditions
presented. Motion seconded by Commissioner Nielson and
carried. ACCEPTANCE: The Commission confirmed
the acceptance of the
approval conditions by Doris Miller.
VIII
Amanda Alderson
requested a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the development of a building to
hold Amanda’s All Star Cheerleading
business. The building is proposed to be built on
Mrs. Alderson. Staff
recommends the following items be completed prior to submission for preliminary or
final
approval of the project by the Planning Commission:
·
Finalized site
plan indicating setbacks; public infrastructure development; driveway
dimensions; parking; minimum 5% landscaping; dumpster enclosure; etc.
·
Contact Jeff
Richens at Price River Water Improvement District (PRWID) at 637-6350 and
complete a waste water survey and comply with any requirements indicated.
·
Submission of
site plan and building plan to Price City Public Works Department for necessary
reviews.
·
Completion and
submission of the following documents:
·
Environmental
Statements
·
Statement of
utility connectivity from all providers
·
Completion of
Price City Development Agreement, as required, with appropriate surety
guarantee to Price City Public Works.
·
Indication of a
6’ sight obscuring fence along the east side of the development separating the
commercial development from the residential use.
·
Completion and
submission of a storm water management plan to be reviewed and concurred with
by the Price City Engineer;
·
Completion and
submission of a qualified geotechnical report (soil study) to the Price City
Engineer;
·
Completion of any
signage plan and submission to
·
Indication of a
minimum of 45 parking spaces (1 per 200 sq. ft of building space – 9,000 sq.
ft. bldg.) or alternate parking capacity to be specifically approved by the
planning commission by CUP (6.4.14 of Code);
Mrs. Alderson stated that the frontage
of the property is 90’ and that the information that she received from the County office shows approx.
60 feet. She will need to do a survey to get the correct footage. The
Commission wants Mrs. Alderson to make sure she has all of the correct measurements
for setbacks and connecting properties to make sure the building will fit in
that space. Commissioner Nielson
questioned the parking space for the property as there is a minimum of 45 parking
spaces that will need to be approved for the building. There should be 1 per
200 sq. ft of building space. Staff recommended that Mrs. Alderson check the
area for more parking. She may speak to the surrounding property owners and
business owners to see if she can use some of their parking to fill the
requirement. This business will be a pick up drop off situation, with parents
dropping off students for a session. By conditional use permit, the
Commissioners could accept a lower parking space plan for this particular
business but needs to reserve up to the 45 space minimum in case of a change of
use to the property in the future. Staff recommends concept only approval. For
preliminary approval, the Fire Chief will need to make sure that the building
project meets fire safety requirements. A fence will need to be installed for
safety reasons and boundary identification concerning adjoining property
owners. A dumpster enclosure will be one of the requirements because of the
residential uses in the area and notification is required to all adjoining
neighbors. Commissioner Nielson would like more discussion with the commission
regarding dumpster enclosure requirements before a decision is made on this
project. The business hours would be from Monday through Friday from
approximately 3 p.m. until 8 p.m. with one instructor and one assistant. The
program usually runs 26 students at one time. MOTION. Commissioner
Nielson moved to approve the Conditional Use Permit concept only for Amanda
Alderson excluding the dumpster enclosure requirement on the lot until further
discussion. Motion seconded by Commissioner A. Richens and carried. ACCEPTANCE:
The Commission confirmed the acceptance of the approval conditions by Amanda
Alderson.
IX CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT- SUBDIVISION PROJECT- CONCEPT AND
PRELIMINARY
HANSEN,
OWNER
Travis Hansen
represented Victor Hansen requesting concept and preliminary approval of a
seven (7) lot subdivision to
be located in northeast Price surrounding the undeveloped prescriptive use
Pinion Drive Road with the approximate
address of 1600 East 600 North. Prior to this submission the developer and
·
The subdivision
request is available under Section 7.7 of the Price City Land Use Management
and Development Code;
·
The proposed
subdivision is located within the Single Family – 6 (SF-6) zoning district, all
proposed lots meet the minimum size, depth, frontage requirements with the
exception of lot 6, the proposed flag lot.
Issues to be discussed relative to the flag lot:
·
Price City Public
Works comments;
·
Storm water
drainage;
·
Perpetual access
on the access lane (easement);
·
Improvements on
the access lane such as curb, gutter, sidewalk, fencing, etc.;
·
Access lane build to minimum
·
The buildable area and potential plans for lot 4 require
additional review relative to the power line and easement crossing the
property. Plans for the power line should
be determined.
·
Recommended
conditions for completion prior to submission of the subdivision project for
final approval include:
·
Completion of
environmental review statements consistent with Section 3.3.2.6 of the Code.
·
Statement of
utility connectivity by all utility providers.
·
Completion and
submission of a qualified geotechnical study (soil report) to Price City Public
Works for review consistent with Section 3.4.2.1 of the Code.
·
Completion of a
qualified storm water drainage plan taking into consideration the 100 year storm
event and concurrence of the storm water management plan by the Price City
Engineering Department.
·
Completion of a
development agreement for the public improvements required and submission of
the appropriate surety guarantee as determined by Price City Public Works. A boilerplate Development
·
Completion of all
requirements set forth by the Price City Public Works and Engineering
Departments relative to infrastructure, design, etc.
·
Completion of
final maps and plats including final plat in mylar or other acceptable format with appropriate
signature blocks.
The
Commissioners had concerns regarding the 20’ stem road that would be located between
lots five (5) and seven (7)
for the access to lot 6. There would be no parking at stem portion and the road
would be a private road. Mr. Hansen
stated that there is a 15’ easement alternative access road on the Sagewood road to lot six (6) that is available. There are three (3)
property owners from that point to Sagewood. The easement
extends down to Sagewood.
There is a power line that goes across lot four (4). Commissioner Nielson
questioned the 30’ from centerline
with the overhead power line. Mr. Hansen still needs to work with Rocky
Mountain Power on that in regard
to requirements.
X CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT- AMENDMENT-PHASE I, PLAT A- FINAL
400 NORTH 1600 EAST- AMERICAN DREAM SUBDIVISION- WASHBURN &
ASSOC.
Paul Washburn
requested an amendment to the American Dream Subdivision, Phase 1, Plat A as previously approved in final
form. The subdivision was not recorded
with the
(3) lots
from the original approval. The removal
of the lots will facilitate their inclusion in a different subdivision
plat ~ to be named American Dream Subdivision, Phase 1, Plat
B. The subdivision amendment request is available
under Section 7.7 of
the
·
Completion of any
and all requirements necessitated by the Price City Public Works and
Engineering Department(s) finding that completion of requirements suggested by
Price City Public Works and Engineering will promote quality long-term development
within the community.
·
Completion and
submission of necessary amended subdivision plat for signatures in mylar or other acceptable format
finding that completion of appropriate subdivision maps create a clear
understanding of development approval format.
John
Dester and Paul Washburn described the projects for
items X, XI, XII, XIII and XIV on the Planning and Zoning Agenda. These are entry level homes for different
household incomes. Different options will be available in regards to the type of homes
available for purchase. The homes will range in price depending on a garage or
carport option. The homes will be
connected by a garage with private back yards that can open into a central park
with a playground and
pavilions. The projects will be done in phases with the approximate starting
date of Spring 2008 or Fall 2008. Chairman Bruno has concerns regarding
at
equipment can be
taken to the site via airport road. Some grading has begun and the canal needs
to be deepened and
widened.
All roads in the development need to be 68’ to 80’ which will accommodate the
traffic flow. Mr.
Washburn assured the Commission
that they will work quickly on the project.
MOTION. Commissioner Nielson
moved to approve the Conditional Use Permit Amendment for American Dream Subdivision.
Motion seconded by Commissioner Sacco and carried. ACCEPTANCE: The Commission
confirmed the acceptance of the approval
conditions by Paul Washburn.
XI CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT- FOUR
400 NORTH 1600 EAST- AMERICAN DREAM SUBDIVISION- WASHBURN &
ASSOC.
Paul Washburn requested final approval of a four (4)
lot subdivision at American Dream. The
proposed subdivision is referred to as American Dream Subdivision, Phase 1, Plat B. The
subdivision request is available under Section 7.7 of the Price City Land Use
Management and Development Code. This
subdivision will facilitate a cost effective starting point for development of
the overall site as previously approved in concept as well as the beginning
phases of Parklane Town Homes and Twin Homes. It is the recommendation of staff to approve
the subdivision request, final as presented. Staff recommends approval with the
following requirements:
·
Completion of any
and all requirements necessitated by the Price City Public Works and
Engineering Department(s) including a development agreement and surety
guarantee finding that completion of requirements suggested by Price City
Public Works and Engineering will promote quality long-term development within
the community.
·
Completion and
submission of necessary subdivision plat for signatures in mylar or other acceptable format finding that
completion of appropriate subdivision maps create a clear understanding of
development approval format.
MOTION. Commissioner Shook
moved to approve the Conditional Use Permit for American Dream Four-lot Subdivision
Phase I, Plat B. Motion seconded by Commissioner R. Richens and carried. ACCEPTANCE:
The Commission confirmed the acceptance of the approval conditions by Paul
Washburn.
XII CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT- PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)- FINAL
400 NORTH 1600 EAST- PARKLANE AT AMERICAN DREAM- WASHBURN
&ASSOC.
John Dester requested a final for a Planned Unit Development
(PUD) development. The PUD is
essentially a one (1) lot
subdivision. This application is for the
subdivision of the entire PUD boundary.
The overall area will be known
as Parklane at American Dream and consist of twin homes
and town homes. The PUD development is available under Section 7.7 of the Price City
Land Use Management and Development Code.
By developing Parklane at American Dream as a PUD the need for a zone
change and zone change hearing is not necessary. The multi-family
nature of the development would have required a zone change from the single
family zoning in place had the
development not been proposed as a PUD. Staff recommends approval with the
following requirements:
·
Completion of all
requirements indicated/recommended by Price City Pubic Works and Engineering
Department(s) finding that completion of recommended matters proposed by Price
City Pubic Works and Engineering Department(s) provides for orderly development
consistent with the Price City General Plan.
·
Completion and
submission of a final PUD subdivision plat in mylar or other acceptable final format for signatures
and recording finding that permanent subdivision maps and records provide for
long-term understanding of development requirements.
·
Provision of
proposed homeowners association documents to
MOTION. Commissioner A.
Richens moved to approve the Conditional Use Permit for Parklane
at American
Dream Planned Unit Development. Motion
seconded by Commissioner Sacco and carried. ACCEPTANCE: The
Commission
confirmed the acceptance of the approval conditions by John Dester.
XIII CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- PARKLANE TOWNHOMES-
FINAL
400
NORTH 1600 EAST- PARKLANE AT DREAM SUBDIVISION- WASHBURN &
ASSOC.
John Dester requested final approval of Parklane
TOWNHOMES at American Dream Subdivision, Plat A, within the boundaries if the Parklane at American Dream Planned Unit Development
(PUD). The townhomes, Plat A,
are to consist of eighteen (18) residential units. The subdivision is available under Section
7.7 of the Price City Land Use Management and Development Code. Staff
recommends approval with the following requirements:
·
Completion of all
requirements indicted/recommended by Price City Pubic Works and Engineering
Department(s) finding that completion of recommended matters proposed by Price
City Pubic Works and Engineering Department(s) provides for orderly development
consistent with the Price City General Plan.
·
Development
Agreement Completed and submission of surety guarantee.
·
Completion and
submission of a final subdivision plat for Parklane Townhomes at American Dream in mylar or other acceptable final format for signatures
and recording finding that permanent subdivision maps and records provide for
long-term understanding of development requirements.
MOTION. Commissioner Shook
moved to approve the Conditional Use Permit for American Dream Subdivision. Motion seconded by Commissioner R. Richens and carried. ACCEPTANCE:
The Commission confirmed the acceptance of the approval
conditions by John Dester.
XIV CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT- PARKLANE TWINHOMES- FINAL
400 NORTH 1600 EAST- AMERICAN DREAM PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT-
WASHBURN & ASSOC.
Please find
attached an application for final approval of Parklane
TWINHOMES at American Dream Subdivision, Plat A, within the boundaries if the Parklane at American Dream Planned Unit Development
(PUD). The twin homes, Plat A, are to
consist of six (6) residential units in three (3) structures. The subdivision is available under Section 7.7 of the Price
City Land Use Management and Development Code. Staff recommends approval with
the following requirements:
·
Completion of all
requirements indicted/recommended by Price City Pubic Works and Engineering
Department(s) finding that completion of recommended matters proposed by Price
City Pubic Works and Engineering Department(s) provides for orderly development
consistent with the Price City General Plan.
Development
Agreement Completed and submission of surety guarantee.
·
Completion and
submission of a final subdivision plat for Parklane Twinhomes at American Dream in mylar or other acceptable final format for signatures
and recording finding that permanent subdivision maps and records provide for
long-term understanding of development requirements.
MOTION. Commissioner Nielson
moved to approve the Conditional Use Permit for the Parklane
Twin homes for American Dream Planned Unit Development. Motion seconded by
Commissioner Sacco and carried. ACCEPTANCE: The Commission confirmed the
acceptance of the approval conditions by John Dester.
XV CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT- AMENDMENT- FINAL
REQUEST BY COMMISSIONER NIELSON- CJ’S
STORAGE- RICK KROMPEL, OWNER
Commissioner
Nielson gave a brief description of an update on the conditional use permit
(CUP) amendment request for Rick Krompel’s storage
building located south of CJ’s Do It Center. He has spoken to the City Engineer
to address drainage concerns affiliated with the property. He also spoke with
Rick Krompel regarding the additional landscaping
along the access lane and 6’ sight obscuring fencing that was requested by the
Planning and Zoning Commission as a condition of approval. Commissioner Nielson
stated that there was communication problems regarding this project and that
the item should come back to the Commission for additional review. Rick Krompel presented this request. He does not like the general
looks or the long term condition of fencing slats and shared with the
Commission his concerns regarding security for his property with a sight
obscuring fence. He felt that because there were no doors on the west side of
the building facing the residential homes, the slats in the fence and the extra
landscaping were over and above what he should be required to do. Mr. Krompel listed several examples of commercial projects that
he felt were not subject to the same requirements that he was by the Planning
and Zoning Commission. Commissioner Nielson stated that the local code requires
a sight obscuring fence where there is a residential property next to a
commercial lot. He also stated that Planning and Zoning can require a sight
obscuring fence when necessary but cannot require what type of fencing material
should be used. Commissioner Nielson would like to make sure there is a purpose
to the fence requirement and that surrounding neighbors are protected as well. Commissioner
Nielson read aloud from Chapter 17, page 17-5 from the Land Use Development and
Management Code, titled “Fences May Be Required- When approved by the City
Council, the Planning Commission may require the erection of fences as a
prerequisite to approval of any project or to the granting of any building
permit where, in the opinion of said Commission, this is necessary to protect
life and property, or to prevent conflict of uses. Such fences shall be of a
type and size necessary, in the opinion of the Planning Commission, to
accomplish the above stated purpose.” The review items for Commission are the
sight obscuring fencing requirement and the landscaping requirements along the
access road for the Krompel project. Commissioner
Nielson said he did think a fence needed to be required there as it would fall
under Chapter 17. Commissioner Bruno stated that each project is treated
individually and that Chapter 7 of the Land Use Development Code defines the
reason a conditional use permit is required. Commissioner Bruno quoted from
Chapter 7; page 7-6 Titled “Conditions Relating to Compliance with Intent of
General Plan and Characteristics of Vicinity- The screening of yards or other
areas as protection from obnoxious land uses and activities”. The landscaping
would be used as a sight and noise buffer as well as the sight obscuring fence
would provide some noise control and allow the surrounding neighbors a
mitigation of the view of a commercial building. The neighbors attending the meeting were
Laurel Marinos and Chris Micoz.
They are concerned about the landscaping and the years it may take to grow and
provide the buffer. Commissioner Shook recommended
more lighting if Mr. Krompel was worried about
security. Commissioner Shook indicated the extra lighting may deter crime and
he doesn’t feel that the slats would provide any less security. Laurel Marinos stated that if Mr. Krompel
did not want to add the slats to the fence, she would be fine with larger
hedges but didn’t know if Chris Micoz felt the same
way. Mrs. Micoz felt that the building is too high
and blocks everything now and would like large trees instead of shrubs. She
said that she doesn’t feel that the slats will provide the necessary security
that Mr. Krompel is concerned about and hoped that he
did not want then neighbors to watch his property. Mr. Krompel
does not expect the neighbors to watch the property and is just concerned that
cars coming along 700 East will be able to see through the slats and think they
can approach the property by Mr. Krompel. Mrs. Micoz would like the barrier to be consistent along the
entire property line but still would like the sight obscuring fence. Commissioner
Sacco believes the neighbors were under the impression that the right thing was
going to be done with the project. She feels that in the future, Planning and Zoning needs to ask more questions on what
affects surrounding neighbors. She knows the communication has been a problem
since the beginning but all three property owners need to get along and work
out their differences. Mr. Krompel stated that the
Planning and Zoning Commission should guide developers into their projects in
relation to the City standards and codes but some of the things that they go
into cross into civil issues that the City shouldn’t be involved in. He will do
what he is requested but wants it to be consistent with other approved commercial
projects. He stated that there will be no pavement on the west side and the
drainage on the property will be natural drainage that all three property
owners currently utilize. Mr. Krompel was asked how
many more buildings will be placed on the property he stated he does not know
at this time exactly what will take place, but there could be four total. All
of the buildings would use the same access into the property which is located north
of the Micoz home. Mrs. Micoz
is concerned about future projects and the noise that will come with each of
those. Commissioner Shook would like to keep the original stipulations set in
place and require the sight obscuring fence and the additional landscaping along
the access lane. If the three owners can get together and work their difference
out and bring it back to the Commission, a decision may be made accordingly
with an amendment if necessary. The recommendations were set at the October 22,
2007 meeting and Mr. Krompel stated he understood the
conditions. MOTION.
Commissioner Shook moved to maintain the Conditional Use Permit with the
recommendations set on October 22, 2007 in place until further notice and deny
Mr. Krompel’s amendment request. Motion seconded by Commissioner
A. Richens and carried. ACCEPTANCE: The Commission confirmed the acceptance of
the approval conditions by Rick Krompel.
XVI UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1.
a. All plat revisions, public right-of-way
dedications, improvement design completed by
12-31-07
b. Completion of development agreement
requirements by 7-1-08
c. Completion of off street parking
requirements by 7-1-09
2. Tom Richardson – Single
Wide Trailer – 01-21-08
Commissioner A. Richens moved
to adjourn the meeting at 8:00 p.m.
APPROVED______________________________
Larry Bruno, Chairman
ATTEST_________________________________
Laurie Tryon, City Recorder